Michael Khalil
Partner | Corporate
michael.khalil@pierferd.com
+1.571.648.3407 office
Washington, D.C.
PDF – vCard
About
A veteran litigator with deep regulatory expertise, Michael Khalil focuses his practice at the intersection of ERISA, federal securities laws, and the investment management industry. Mr. Khalil provides sophisticated and pragmatic counsel to employers, investment advisers, and plan service providers on ERISA’s requirements, including with regard to questions and controversies involving ERISA’s fiduciary standards, prohibited transaction provisions, and plan design. With his 1940 Act expertise, he is uniquely qualified to help both fiduciaries and funds navigate the risks and opportunities arising from the expansion of ERISA plan assets into private markets. Mr. Khalil steers financial institutions through the complexities of ERISA and the securities laws when designing products for, and providing services to, retirement plans and ERISA funds. He leverages his years of successful litigation expertise and DOL enforcement experience to ensure that representation is both pragmatic and value-driven.
-
Immediately prior to joining Pierson Ferdinand, Mr. Khalil was Senior Counsel in the SEC’s Division of Investment Management Rulemaking Office, where he acted as lead counsel on regulations involving registered insurance products, private fund exemptions, and amendments to Reg S-P, and offered advice on regulatory priorities, including expanding retail access to private assets and potential amendments to the fund cross-trading rule. Mr. Khalil also served as a Litigation Counsel and Senior Trial Attorney in the U.S. Department of Labor’s Office of the Solicitor, leading high-priority ERISA litigation and advising EBSA on enforcement policy. Prior to his public service, Mr. Khalil was a member at Miller & Chevalier Chartered, where he served as Vice-Chair of the firm’s Employee Benefit practice, and an associate at Sutherland, Asbill and Brennan (n/k/a Eversheds Sutherland).
ERISA Litigation
Mr. Khalil has nearly twenty years of experience representing plan sponsors, fiduciaries, financial service providers, and insurers in a wide variety of ERISA litigation in federal trial and appellate courts. As a Litigation Counsel in the DOL’s Plan Benefits Security Division, Mr. Khalil supervised a diverse portfolio of ERISA litigation involving complex financial transactions and novel pension and health plan issues. Mr. Khalil advised EBSA regarding enforcement policy and regulatory proposals, and directed pre-litigation assistance to EBSA regional offices in connection with ongoing investigations involving potential violations of ERISA’s fiduciary, disclosure, prohibited transaction, and parity provisions. Prior to his time in public service, Mr. Khalil spent more than a decade representing clients in complex civil litigation on an array of matters arising under Titles I and IV of ERISA and the Affordable Care Act, obtaining successful results for his clients in federal trial courts and courts of appeals, frequently in cases involving novel claims. His broad expertise includes DOL investigations, MHPAEA issues, and ERISA litigation involving fiduciary breach claims, ESOPs, excessive fee claims, Title IV/PBGC matters, and health care claims.
ERISA Counseling
Mr. Khalil advises plan sponsors, investment advisers, and financial service providers on ERISA fiduciary issues and prohibited transactions, as well as matters respecting plan design, governance, administration, and investment issues including with regard to navigating novel complexities associated with investing ERISA plan assets in private markets. Mr. Khalil also has particular expertise in helping plans comply with the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act incorporated into ERISA, having spearheaded parity enforcement and guidance arising from amendments to ERISA’s MHPAEA provisions, and helping launch EBSA’s Mental Health Parity Task Force. Mr. Khalil prides himself on listening to his clients and leveraging his expertise as a counselor, litigator, and regulator to provide them with value-driven, practical solutions.
Asset Management
Mr. Khalil leverages his years as a Senior Counsel at the SEC to advise sophisticated funds and investment advisors on issues arising under the Investment Company Act of 1940, including regulatory compliance matters, rulemaking, registration, exemptive relief, and assisting with examinations. While at the SEC, Mr. Khalil played a pivotal role in crafting novel regulations providing a tailored registration and disclosure framework for offerings of registered index-linked annuities. He led regulatory reform resulting in the expansion of private funds’ ability to rely on the 3(c)(1) private fund exemption for qualifying venture capital funds. Mr. Khalil was also a lead counsel driving the SEC’s 2024 amendments to Reg S-P and has worked with industry to facilitate their compliance efforts by speaking on numerous compliance outreach panels and responding to implementation questions. Additionally, Mr. Khalil advised the Division of Investment Management about a host of regulatory priorities, including expanding retail access to private assets, and potential amendments to the fund cross-trading rule and fund proxy rules. Having acted as the Division of Investment Management’s liaison to DOL on matters crossing regulatory regimes, Mr. Khalil uses his unique expertise to help firms and fund boards navigate the complexities of the 1940 Act and ERISA as they look to bring private-market products into the retirement space.
Practices
Broker-Dealer Regulation
Employment and Labor
Environmental, Social & Governance (ESG)
Executive Compensation and Benefits
Government Affairs
Private Investment Funds
Securities
Tax/ERISA
Admissions
District of Columbia
Maryland
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
U.S. Supreme Court
Education
The University of Michigan Law School, J.D., cum laude
Gettysburg College, B.A.
Memberships and Recognition
SEC’s Division of Investment Management - Director’s Rulemaking Award, 2024
Secretary of Labor’s Exceptional Achievement Award, 2022
DOL MHPAEA Task Force, Feb. 2021-2023
Government Editor, ABA’s Employee Benefits Committee Newsletter, 2019-2023
Vice-Chair, Miller & Chevalier Employee Benefits Department, 2015-2019
Fellow, Leadership Council on Legal Diversity, 2018
Legal 500: Labor & Employment: ERISA Litigation, 2016-2018
Government Experience
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Division of Investment Management, Rulemaking Office, Senior Counsel
U.S. Department of Labor, Office of the Solicitor, Plan Benefits Security Division, Counsel for Litigation, Senior Trial Attorney
Law Firm Experience
Miller & Chevalier Chartered, Vice-Chair, Employee Benefits Department
Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP (n/k/a Evershed Sutherland)
Representative Experience
Regulatory Experience
Spearheaded development of new regulation expanding the ability of private funds to rely on section 3(c)(1) exemption by increasing the dollar threshold for qualifying venture capital funds and providing a mechanism for future inflation adjustments. See Qualifying Venture Capital Funds Inflation Adjustment (Aug. 21, 2024).
Key member of the rulemaking team providing a new tailored registration and disclosure framework for offerings of registered index-linked annuities. See Registration for Index-Linked Annuities; Amendments to Form N-4 for Index-Linked and Variable Annuities (July 1, 2024).
Lead member of the rulemaking team providing updated requirements for how funds, advisers, broker-dealers, and transfer agents must safeguard and dispose of customer information, spearheading recommendations for new customer notification requirements for cyber breaches. See Regulation S-P: Privacy of Consumer Financial Information and Safeguarding Customer Information (May 16, 2024).
Spearhead parity enforcement and guidance arising from amendments to ERISA’s MHPAEA provisions. Drafted memoranda interpreting novel issues, including: responsibilities of plans and issuers under amendments; the Department’s powers and responsibilities; potential enforcement and regulatory strategies; and judicial review of agency determinations. Drafted compliance documents including determination letters and insufficiency notices.
Litigation Matters
Successfully opposed certiorari in Laurent v. PwC, No. 20-28 (S.C. filed May 25, 2021), arguing that, in case where participants were denied pension benefits pursuant to plan terms that violate ERISA, ERISA’s remedial scheme allows for a two-step remedy under ERISA sections 502(a)(3) and 502(a)(1)(B).
Successfully represented the Secretary of Labor in novel MHPAEA suit before the First Circuit. See N.R. by & through S.R. v. Raytheon Co., 24 F.4th 740 (1st Cir. 2022) (adopting Secretary’s position that, in construing ERISA benefits claim, MHPAEA’s requirements overrule contrary plan terms).
Obtained complete dismissal for defendant health insurer involving novel claims under ERISA and the ACA. See DB Healthcare, LLC v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Ariz., Inc., 852 F.3d 868 (9th Cir. 2017), aff’g 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93170 (D. Ariz. July 8, 2014).
Obtained reversal of trial court's holding that an in-network healthcare provider qualified as an ERISA beneficiary with standing to sue defendant health insurer under ERISA section 502. See Pa. Chiropractic Ass'n v. Indep. Hosp. Indem. Plan, Inc., 802 F.3d 926 (7th Cir. 2015).
Obtained order denying motion to dismiss in action challenging the PBGC’s allocation of assets under ERISA section 4044 and holding that participants could seek equitable remedies of a financial nature for a breach of its fiduciary duty under section 4003. See Lewis v. PBGC, 197 F. Supp. 3d 16 (D.D.C. 2016), rev’d in part, 901 F.3d 406 (D.C. Cir. 2018).
Defeated motion to dismiss and prevailed on numerous significant pre-trial motions in suit challenging termination of pension plan under ERISA section 4042. See, e.g., Black v. PBGC, No. 09-13616, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 100859 (E.D. Mich.) (ordering discovery beyond administrative record and de novo review of agency action), recons denied, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 113522 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 3, 2011); U.S. Dep’t of Treasury v. PBGC, 351 F. Supp.3d 140 (D.D.C. 2018) (granting renewed motion to compel overcoming the assertion of the presidential communications privilege).
Publications
Regulation S-P, Compliance Outreach for Large Firms, September 2025
Information Security & Operational Resiliency, SEC Compliance Outreach Program for Investment Adviser and Investment Company Senior Officers, November 2024
Global Perspectives: Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulatory Strategies Across Jurisdictions, The Investment Association, April 2024
Update on New Remedies and Equitable Relief Under ERISA § 502(a)(3); ACI’s 16th National ERISA Litigation Conference, October 2018
The Evolving State of Remedies and Equitable Relief Under ERISA § 502(a)(3): New Remedies Post-Montanile; ACI’s 15th National ERISA Litigation Conference, November 2017
Dudenhoeffer, Tibble, and the Duty of Prudence, ABA Employee Benefits Committee Newsletter, Summer 2017