Michael Khalil

Partner | Corporate

About

A veteran litigator with deep regulatory expertise, Michael Khalil focuses his practice at the intersection of ERISA, federal securities laws, and the investment management industry. Mr. Khalil provides sophisticated and pragmatic counsel to employers, investment advisers, and plan service providers on ERISA’s requirements, including with regard to questions and controversies involving ERISA’s fiduciary standards, prohibited transaction provisions, and plan design. With his 1940 Act expertise, he is uniquely qualified to help both fiduciaries and funds navigate the risks and opportunities arising from the expansion of ERISA plan assets into private markets. Mr. Khalil steers financial institutions through the complexities of ERISA and the securities laws when designing products for, and providing services to, retirement plans and ERISA funds. He leverages his years of successful litigation expertise and DOL enforcement experience to ensure that representation is both pragmatic and value-driven.


Practices

  • Broker-Dealer Regulation

  • Employment and Labor

  • Environmental, Social & Governance (ESG)

  • ERISA, Tax, and Employee Benefits

  • Government Affairs

  • Private Investment Funds

  • Securities

  • International Insurance Regulatory and Transactional

Admissions

  • District of Columbia

  • Maryland

  • U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

  • U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan

  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

  • U.S. Supreme Court


Education

  • The University of Michigan Law School, J.D., cum laude

  • Gettysburg College, B.A.


Memberships and Recognition

  • SEC’s Division of Investment Management - Director’s Rulemaking Award, 2024

  • Secretary of Labor’s Exceptional Achievement Award, 2022

  • DOL MHPAEA Task Force, Feb. 2021-2023

  • Government Editor, ABA’s Employee Benefits Committee Newsletter, 2019-2023

  • Vice-Chair, Miller & Chevalier Employee Benefits Department, 2015-2019

  • Fellow, Leadership Council on Legal Diversity, 2018

  • Legal 500: Labor & Employment: ERISA Litigation, 2016-2018

Government Experience

  • U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Division of Investment Management, Rulemaking Office, Senior Counsel

  • U.S. Department of Labor, Office of the Solicitor, Plan Benefits Security Division, Counsel for Litigation, Senior Trial Attorney


Law Firm Experience

  • Miller & Chevalier Chartered, Vice-Chair, Employee Benefits Department

  • Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP (n/k/a Evershed Sutherland)


Representative Experience

Regulatory Experience

  • Spearheaded development of new regulation expanding the ability of private funds to rely on section 3(c)(1) exemption by increasing the dollar threshold for qualifying venture capital funds and providing a mechanism for future inflation adjustments. See Qualifying Venture Capital Funds Inflation Adjustment (Aug. 21, 2024).

  • Key member of the rulemaking team providing a new tailored registration and disclosure framework for offerings of registered index-linked annuities. See Registration for Index-Linked Annuities; Amendments to Form N-4 for Index-Linked and Variable Annuities (July 1, 2024).

  • Lead member of the rulemaking team providing updated requirements for how funds, advisers, broker-dealers, and transfer agents must safeguard and dispose of customer information, spearheading recommendations for new customer notification requirements for cyber breaches. See Regulation S-P: Privacy of Consumer Financial Information and Safeguarding Customer Information (May 16, 2024).

  • Spearhead parity enforcement and guidance arising from amendments to ERISA’s MHPAEA provisions. Drafted memoranda interpreting novel issues, including: responsibilities of plans and issuers under amendments; the Department’s powers and responsibilities; potential enforcement and regulatory strategies; and judicial review of agency determinations. Drafted compliance documents including determination letters and insufficiency notices.

Litigation Matters

  • Successfully opposed certiorari in Laurent v. PwC, No. 20-28 (S.C. filed May 25, 2021), arguing that, in case where participants were denied pension benefits pursuant to plan terms that violate ERISA, ERISA’s remedial scheme allows for a two-step remedy under ERISA sections 502(a)(3) and 502(a)(1)(B).

  • Successfully represented the Secretary of Labor in novel MHPAEA suit before the First Circuit. See N.R. by & through S.R. v. Raytheon Co., 24 F.4th 740 (1st Cir. 2022) (adopting Secretary’s position that, in construing ERISA benefits claim, MHPAEA’s requirements overrule contrary plan terms).

  • Obtained complete dismissal for defendant health insurer involving novel claims under ERISA and the ACA. See DB Healthcare, LLC v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Ariz., Inc., 852 F.3d 868 (9th Cir. 2017), aff’g 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93170 (D. Ariz. July 8, 2014).

  • Obtained reversal of trial court's holding that an in-network healthcare provider qualified as an ERISA beneficiary with standing to sue defendant health insurer under ERISA section 502. See Pa. Chiropractic Ass'n v. Indep. Hosp. Indem. Plan, Inc., 802 F.3d 926 (7th Cir. 2015).

  • Obtained order denying motion to dismiss in action challenging the PBGC’s allocation of assets under ERISA section 4044 and holding that participants could seek equitable remedies of a financial nature for a breach of its fiduciary duty under section 4003. See Lewis v. PBGC, 197 F. Supp. 3d 16 (D.D.C. 2016), rev’d in part, 901 F.3d 406 (D.C. Cir. 2018).

  • Defeated motion to dismiss and prevailed on numerous significant pre-trial motions in suit challenging termination of pension plan under ERISA section 4042. See, e.g., Black v. PBGC, No. 09-13616, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 100859 (E.D. Mich.) (ordering discovery beyond administrative record and de novo review of agency action), recons denied, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 113522 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 3, 2011); U.S. Dep’t of Treasury v. PBGC, 351 F. Supp.3d 140 (D.D.C. 2018) (granting renewed motion to compel overcoming the assertion of the presidential communications privilege).

Publications


In the News