INSIGHTS

Client Alerts & Publications

Client Alert Trevor Rubin Client Alert Trevor Rubin

FTC Targets Below-Threshold Deal Structure With “Largest Ever” Merger-Reporting Penalty

On July 13, 2026, the Federal Trade Commission announced a $12 million settlement of charges that Edwards Lifesciences Corp. acquired a medical-device maker without complying with the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act’s (HSR) notification and waiting-period requirements. According to the complaint, Edwards and Genesis intentionally structured the deal to avoid HSR compliance.

Read More
Client Alert Trevor Rubin Client Alert Trevor Rubin

“Made in USA” Marketing Scrutiny Heats Up With New Round of FTC Warning Letters

On July 6, 2026, the Federal Trade Commission continued its enforcement against non-compliant “Made in the USA” claims by issuing warning letters to a new group of manufacturers and retailers. The FTC’s latest warning letters went to seven companies “that appear to have misrepresented certain products as ‘Made in the USA’” and another company “that appears to have misrepresented certain products as ‘Made in Texas.’” Together with the executive action and enforcement activity discussed below, these letters send a strong signal that federal scrutiny of “Made in the USA” claims is a firmly established enforcement priority and underscores the importance of proactive compliance.

Read More
Client Alert Trevor Rubin Client Alert Trevor Rubin

Plaintiffs Notch First Pay-for-Delay Jury Verdict 13 Years After FTC v. Actavis

On May 18, 2026, after a five-week trial, a federal jury in Boston awarded over $884 million in single damages against Takeda Pharmaceuticals for entering into an anticompetitive “pay-for-delay” settlement of patent litigation that delayed generic competition. With automatic trebling, the verdict is expected to balloon to over $2.6 billion. Not only is the exposure significant, but this is the first time that a jury has found a patent holder liable for delaying generic pharmaceuticals in the 13 years since the Supreme Court decided FTC v. Actavis.  This bulletin discusses the relevant allegations, the jury’s findings, and the implications, including the potential for the Supreme Court to revisit such challenges.

Read More
Client Alert Trevor Rubin Client Alert Trevor Rubin

A “Landmark” Win or a Strategic Escape? Unpacking the FTC’s Express Scripts Deal

In February 2026, the Federal Trade Commission announced that it “secured a landmark settlement” with Express Scripts—one of the nation’s largest pharmacy benefit managers.  Formalized as a consent order, the settlement represents a milestone in efforts to rein in PBMs, whose practices largely escaped regulatory scrutiny until the FTC launched an industry-wide inquiry in 2022. That inquiry eventually led to the FTC bringing an administrative action against the “Big 3” PBMs in 2024, alleging that they inflated the list price of insulin drugs through rebate and other anticompetitive and unfair practices.

Read More